Описание

Reporting Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Name: Reporting Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Brand: OMNIScriptum
SKU: 6048555483
Price: 1044 RUB
Availability: InStock

Артикул Маркета

6048555483

ISBN

9783838361512

Обложка

мягкий

Бумага

офсетная

Внешний вид товаров и/или упаковки может быть изменён изготовителем и отличаться от изображенных на Яндекс Маркете.

Все характеристики

Пэй

2 041 ₽

–49%

–200 ₽

С доставкой по клику

Заказ от 1500₽

Reporting Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Задать вопрос

Пэй

2 041 ₽

–49%

Доставка Маркета

2 окт, по клику 0 ₽

Москва

2 окт, пункт выдачи 0 ₽

Москва

Быстрый возврат

О возвратах

Т8 Издательские Технологии

Магазин

4.7 1.2K оценок

19.1Kзаказов

593подписчика

6лет на Маркете

О товаре

Описание

Печатная книга «Reporting Complementary and Alternative Medicine» в мягкой обложке, язык - английский. В книге 96 страниц, она напечатана на белой офсетной бумаге плотностью 80 г/м². Формат издания — 152x229 мм. Все книги аккуратно упаковываем в прочный трёхслойный непрозрачный картонный конверт.
This longitudinal study gave an overview of the 47- year coverage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a news magazine Time and a popular science magazine Scientific American through a content analysis. It found the coverage in both magazines increased over the time period and shared some similarities in topic selection and types of CAM covered, depicting the path for the prevalence of these non-conventional therapies in the United States. However, only the coverage in Time was consistent with the prediction of the diffusion of innovation theory. The two magazines were also different in framing these therapies due to their discrete readerships. Time focused more on the social connotations of the subject, while Scientific American showed more interest in the research value of these therapies. Time included more varied sources, while Scientific American relied heavily on academicians. Finally, the study attempted to establish an agenda-setting relationship between the two magazines and five top medical journals in their CAM coverage but failed to find statistical significance.