Описание

Implementing antimicrobial stewardship programmes. doctors attitudes

Name: Implementing antimicrobial stewardship programmes. doctors attitudes
Brand: OMNIScriptum
SKU: 5951594402
Price: 1196 RUB
Availability: InStock

Артикул Маркета

5951594402

ISBN

9783659717406

Обложка

мягкий

Бумага

офсетная

Внешний вид товаров и/или упаковки может быть изменён изготовителем и отличаться от изображенных на Яндекс Маркете.

Все характеристики

Пэй

2 228 ₽

–46%

–200 ₽

С доставкой по клику

Заказ от 1500₽

Implementing antimicrobial stewardship programmes. doctors attitudes

Задать вопрос

Пэй

2 228 ₽

–46%

Доставка Маркета

1 окт, по клику 0 ₽

Москва

1 окт, пункт выдачи 0 ₽

Москва

Быстрый возврат

О возвратах

Т8 Издательские Технологии

Магазин

4.7 1.2K оценок

19.1Kзаказов

592подписчика

6лет на Маркете

О товаре

Описание

Печатная книга «Implementing antimicrobial stewardship programmes. doctors attitudes» в мягкой обложке, язык - английский. В книге 148 страниц, она напечатана на белой офсетной бумаге плотностью 80 г/м². Формат издания — 152x229 мм. Все книги аккуратно упаковываем в прочный трёхслойный непрозрачный картонный конверт.
Antimicrobial stewardship programmes are significant in clinical practice to reduce emerging resistance. The aim of this research was to conduct interviews with 28 doctors in Cavan General Hospital in order to explore their attitudes on the barriers and facilitators to implementing antimicrobial stewardship programmes in acute appendicitis. Assisted by an interview schedule, interviews were conducted post ethical approval and informed consent. Data were transcribed and analysed using software designed for qualitative research and the framework method was applied. All data were anonymous, coded and securely stored. Three key themes emerged as barriers to implementation. Theme 1 identified lack of knowledge, experience and confidence as barriers to successful implementation. In Theme 2, disagreement with antimicrobial guidelines by doctors and ineffective communication between the guideline developers and users emerged as the main barriers. Theme 3 identified the presence of contradictory literature resulted in guideline barriers as well as lack of time and resources. The use of a high level of evidence and the involvement of doctors in their development emerged as key facilitators.